Journal: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
Article Title: Physical Activity in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Which Real-World Accelerometry Measures Are Robust? A Systematic Review
doi: 10.3390/s23177615
Figure Lengend Snippet: Design, settings and aims of studies included in the systematic review.
Article Snippet: Criterion validity between research-grade wearables and consumer-grade wearables was excellent for step counts measured at the right hip: ICC = 0.94 (95%CI [0.88, 0.97]) (FitBit One/Zip versus ActiGraph GT3X+) [ ] and the waist: ICC = 0.96 (95%CI [0.91, 0.99]) (Misfit Shine versus ActiGraph GT3X+) [ ] and ICC = 0.91 (95%CI [0.79, 0.97]) (NL2000i) [ ], but lower on the wrist: ICC ranged from ICC = 0.83 (95%CI [0.59, 0.93]) (Misfit Shine versus NL2000i) to ICC = 0.86 (95%CI [0.67, 0.94]) (Misfit Shine versus ActiGraph GT3X+) [ ].
Techniques: Activity Assay, Biomarker Discovery, Adhesive, Medications, Selection